Fedora remove duplicate packages from partially-completed dnf update

On my Fedora 27 systems, my system froze up when I was updating all the packages (I suspect I’m having hardware problems).

My system did reboot just fine, but not all ancillary services came up. During my troubleshooting, I discovered that there were multiple versions of packages installed for hundreds of packages.

After some brief Internet searches, I found my solution:

sudo dnf remove --duplicates

Output will resemble:

Last metadata expiration check: 1:14:37 ago on Sat 31 Mar 2018 09:52:43 PM EDT.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package                       Arch   Version            Repository        Size
================================================================================
Reinstalling:
 ImageMagick                   x86_64 1:6.9.9.38-1.fc27  updates-smith122 186 k
     replacing  ImageMagick.x86_64 1:6.9.9.27-1.fc27
 ImageMagick-libs              x86_64 1:6.9.9.38-1.fc27  updates-smith122 2.3 M
     replacing  ImageMagick-libs.x86_64 1:6.9.9.27-1.fc27
 abrt                          x86_64 2.10.7-1.fc27      updates-smith122 525 k
     replacing  abrt.x86_64 2.10.5-1.fc27
 abrt-addon-ccpp               x86_64 2.10.7-1.fc27      updates-smith122 130 k
     replacing  abrt-addon-ccpp.x86_64 2.10.5-1.fc27
 abrt-addon-coredump-helper    x86_64 2.10.7-1.fc27      updates-smith122  40 k
     replacing  abrt-addon-coredump-helper.x86_64 2.10.5-1.fc27
 abrt-addon-kerneloops         x86_64 2.10.7-1.fc27      updates-smith122  54 k
     replacing  abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64 2.10.5-1.fc27
 abrt-addon-pstoreoops         x86_64 2.10.7-1.fc27      updates-smith122  32 k
     replacing  abrt-addon-pstoreoops.x86_64 2.10.5-1.fc27

References

Weblinks

  1. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/95550/how-to-remove-duplicate-packages-installed-with-dnf-on-fedora-24/
Advertisements

Logical or in package dependencies

Logical OR in rpm dependencies

Requires: (wine >= 1.3 or /usr/bin/wine)

Logical OR in dpkg dependencies

Depends: wine (>= 1.3) | wine-staging | winehq-staging | winehq

References

Weblinks

  1. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#document-ch-relationships
  2. rpm since 4.13.0http://rpm.org/user_doc/more_dependencies.html
  3. http://rpm.org/user_doc/boolean_dependencies.html

List available packages from one repository

For dnf

dnf list available --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=reponame

For dpkg (low-level package manager for apt)

ff() { for file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/$1.list; do grep -iE "Package:" "/var/lib/apt/lists/$( cut -d' ' -f2 "${file}" | sed -r -e 'sX\/X_Xg;' -e 's/\<http.__//g;')Packages"; done; }
ff reponame

The story

For some reason it is harder to manage packages with apt: This is a main reason I don’t like to use it. I had to go write this crazy one-liner function to accomplish the same task that dnf provides with just two flags.
Also, the apt command here shows all the packages from that repository, regardless of its installed state. The dnf command will show only the ones available that are not already installed.

Dnf ignore weak dependencies

tl;dr

dnf --setopt=install_weak_deps=False --best install newpackage

dnf do not install weak dependencies

In the new paradigm for rpm package management (rpmpm?), we use dnf. I am fine with using the latest and greatest, but sometimes yum looks nicer in hindsight than dnf.

One of the more recent features added to rpms is weak dependencies. Debian has had weak dependencies for a longer time, so it’s nice to see rpm adding such a feature.

I recently went through a spell where I wanted to install my own package but exclude the recommended options.

After a lot of research and man dnf dnf.conf, I derived the command I needed.

dnf --setopt=install_weak_deps=False --best install newpackage

History

I tried an ugly hack, which technically worked.

dnf --disablerepo=* install ./bgscripts*

But all it does is disable all repos. I was using a local file, so it could get to the rpm I required, but any hard dependencies would be not found. I then tried another option, which technically worked.

dnf install ./bgscripts* -x freerdp

But I had to run a dnf command to see what packages would be installed, and then manually named the packages in the exclude list.

References

Weblinks

  1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/WeakDependencies
  2. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html

Man pages

dnf

dnf.conf

Find which package provides a file – Yum and Apt

On Fedora-like systems, the default package manager is yum (or dnf for Fedora 22+). The main way you use it is to install packages and auto-resolve the dependencies.
yum install irfan
Similarly, apt-get on the Debian family of GNU/Linux installs packages with this command.
apt-get install irfan
Now, let’s say you are looking for which package installs a particular file. The command for yum is:
yum provides */filename
On Ubuntu, part of the Debian family, you need to install the package apt-file before you can do similar lookup commands.
apt-get install apt-file
Now you can search with:
apt-file search */filename

Update just one repository on Linux

So if you build your own packages (rpm/dpkg/other), you might have your own repository of packages for your systems. And if you want to tell your hosts to update just the one repository, you might be looking for a solution.

A user on Ask Ubuntu had a fantastic answer for Ubuntu/debian flavor: http://askubuntu.com/questions/65245/apt-get-update-only-for-a-specific-repository/197532#197532.

For those of you who don’t want to click through, here is a summary of the entries, collapsed down to just one file (which might not be the best solution, but it works).
Add these lines to ~/.bashrc:
update-repo() {
for source in "$@"; do
sudo apt-get update -o Dir::Etc::sourcelist="sources.list.d/${source}" \
-o Dir::Etc::sourceparts="-" -o APT::Get::List-Cleanup="0"
done
}

_ppa_lists(){
local cur
_init_completion || return

COMPREPLY=( $( find /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ -name "*$cur*.list" \
-exec basename {} \; 2> /dev/null ) )
return 0
} &&
complete -F _ppa_lists update-repo

With rpm-based systems like RHEL/CentOS/Fedora, you are using yum or dnf. Here’s my dnf implementation:

_command_dnf=yum
which dnf 1>/dev/null 2>&1 && _command_dnf="$( which dnf 2>/dev/null )"

# update-repo command for dnf update just one repository
update-repo() {
case "${_command_dnf}" in
*dnf)
for source in "$@"; do
sudo "${_command_dnf}" check-update -q --refresh --disablerepo=* --enablerepo="${source}"
done
;;
*yum)
for source in "$@"; do
sudo "${_command_dnf}" clean metadata -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo="${source}" -q; yum check-update -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo="${source}"
done
;;
esac
}

# autocomplete for update-repo
_repo_lists() {
local cur
_init_completion || return
COMPREPLY=( $( grep -hoiE -- "^\[.*\]" /etc/yum.repos.d/* | tr -d '[]' | grep -E "^${2:-.*}" ) )
return 0
} &&
complete -F _repo_lists -o filenames update-repo

The functions whose names start with an underscore are the auto-complete commands. Who doesn’t like a good tab auto-completion? Now that I learned how to do my own bash-completion, I’ll be doing it a lot more!